The Good Parent

            All parents have dreams for their child.  Often these include living a happy life, being healthy, getting a good job, marrying well, and perhaps even having children of their won.  Many foster a love of learning: from books or from experience.   

            Back in the early 1940s, it was possible to support a family and live moderately without a high school diploma.  College was often seen as only for the rich and the leisurely.  I was raised to believe that my only function in life was to marry early and have lots of children.

There’s a basis for this way of thinking.

My mother completed eighth grade, after three attempts. With her limited education, she was able to find, and hold, several, very different jobs. The one she loved the most was as the head telephone operator for the federal offices in San Francisco.

She came up with suggestions to improve service as well as helping disabled workers find success. The story she loved to tell was about a legally blind operator.

At first, my mother was miffed that he’d been hired. Back then, calls were connected by colored lines being fit into colored slots. Obviously, he couldn’t see either.

On her free time at work and at home, my mother experimented with various simple-to-make devices until she came up with a workable idea. Because of her ingenuity, the man succeeded and she won a cherished financial award.

While her limited education excluded her from high-paying positions, her ingenuity got the approval of her boss.

            My father graduated from high school but was unable to find a job. He finally got hired to work in a bowling alley where he’d jump from lane to lane, setting up pins. It wasn’t satisfying, but he earned enough to move out of the family home.

When World War II started, he enlisted. He seldom got off the ship, so although he sailed all over the world, he had no idea what was out there.

He did learn to be a machinist, a valuable skill that he used in his first “real” job, assembling machinery for National Cash Register in Dayton, Ohio. He soon grew tired of the job, landing next in a company that printed newspapers. He was a good speller, which came in handy as he set type into place, from back to front.

He loved being a typesetter, but by the time we moved to California in 1964, more and more printing jobs were being done by giant computers. From there he tried all kinds of jobs, including being a nighttime security guard, driving rental cars from one location to another, delivering phone books, and doing odd jobs at construction sites.

While we were never rich, except for when we moved from Ohio to California, we had shelter, food, and clothes. My parents placed some value on education, demanding good grades and excellent behavior. Bu they never visited the various schools we attended or talked to the teachers.

Neither of them seemed to value education beyond high school, primarily because they had succeeded without any advanced courses.

My brother and I had different ideas. While they readily accepted that my brother, who they believed was a genius, should go to college, they saw no need for me to do so.

In their eyes, my brother would succeed and go on to a high-paying career. 

For me? I was supposed to marry young and begin reproducing immediately.  That wasn’t what I wanted, and so even when they died, I was a disappointment.

            I dreamed of being a teacher because school was the one place where I felt safe. Many of my teachers were mean, several using physical punishment to reprimand disobedient students. I was smacked with a ruler several times, sat in the corner on a stool, and the most terrifying, clicked at by the nuns. My sins? Lack of attention.

After I became a teacher, I realized that I would have been classified as ADD, Attention Deficit Disordered. While I could sit all day, my mind drifted off here and there, so I often missed lectures and descriptions of assignments. My grades weren’t as good as my brother’s even though the old IQ tests placed me higher than my brother, who was a genius.

After having kids of my own, I finally had the opportunity to earn a teaching credential. I taught a whopping thirty-four years. During that time, I met parents with limited education who ushed their kids to stay in school, wishing that their children wouldn’t have to struggle to survive.

There were parents whose only hope was that their kids find work so as to contribute to the family income. These kids often went to work in a family-owned business, earning minimum wage. In California, such low income meant that the kids were stuck at home.

            On the opposite end of the spectrum, I met many parents who set unrealistic goals for their academically disabled children, wanting them to earn a college degree when reading texts would be nearly impossible without tremendous support. Nothing short of a college preparatory program would do, so they chose challenging courses such as AP Biology or AP English. When the inevitable low grades came in, the parents chastised the teachers.

            Over time I began dividing parents into three distinct types: over-involved, under-involved, and just right. There were some who wavered between categories, putting on bursts of energy at strange, incomprehensible times, and then disappearing for months.

This category of parent drove teachers nuts, for you never knew which parent was on the other end of the line. 

            I began my career as a preschool teacher for children ages two to four. I loved the kids and found teaching them songs and academics fulfilling. What was difficult, however, was dealing with over-involved parents.

I understood that it was hard to leave your child at the door with a stranger. Even after class began, for the first few days of class, a small group of parents peered in the windows, to making sure that Johnny and Maria were safe.

Over time, I began to think of “involvement” as a line on the floor.  If you’re standing on the line, you’re in perfect position to guide your child through academia. On either side of the line, and things don’t always go smoothly. The over-involved parent would smother the child, while the under-involved left the child to drown.

            At the high school level, an over-involved parent might demand college-level course outlines for every class, yet couldn’t be bothered to utilize the online program that helped both parents and students keep track of upcoming assignments. Such parents felt it was the teacher’s problem when the son didn’t bring his trombone home, or when the daughter forgot to complete her Algebra homework.

            I worked with parents who demanded weekly meetings to track their child’s progress. It came off as a highly effective form of intimidation. They challenged every grade on every assignment, wanting to know precisely why Timothy didn’t have straight As.

Then there were parents of intelligent college-bound students who wanted their child labeled as having a specific learning disability. They believed that being identified as ADHD or OCD would get then preferential status on college admissions. They’d spend thousands of dollars dragging the child from specialist to specialist until they found one who applied the desired labels.

            For some parents, failure is not an option, even when the child has chosen that path. This type of parent will blame the teacher if the student sleeps through class, turns in no work, and fails tests. Or it’s the administration’s fault if the student cuts class and walks off campus to spend the day at the mall or the cinema. My favorite was casting blame on anyone who might have come in contact with their child, saying that dear Thomas was only holding his friend’s marijuana, knife, or cigarettes.

            Excuses, excuses, but never place the blame where it truly belongs.  If Bill can’t stay awake during the school day, move the computer, phone, and television out of his bedroom.  If Tess isn’t doing her homework, ask to see it every night.  If Phoung is leaving campus, hand him a lunch bag in the morning. If your child doesn’t feel safe walking to school, drive them or join a carpool. 

There are always solutions, but they require parents taking responsible action.

            Under-involved parents are a real puzzle, especially when the child has a learning disability that makes reading and writing challenging. Many of these parents are evasive, not showing up on Back-to-School Night or on Report Card night, and eve at the child’s annual Special Education meeting.  They never return calls or check grades.

            Where are these parents when their children need them?  My students often shared that their parents worked three jobs in order to pay the rent. There were a goodly number of parents who didn’t speak English and were uncomfortable dealing with school. And in this group, quite a few were illegal immigrants and who were terrified of being deported.

I had parents who were currently incarcerated, addicted to alcohol and drugs, or involved in illegal activities such as ferrying undocumented workers across the border. I spoke with a handful of mothers who struggled with agoraphobia, and fathers who returned home after the child went to bed, are who were asleep when the student left for school in the morning.

            At the high school level, it seemed that “just right’ parents were few and far between.  I understood how hard it is to not be too involved, yet concerned enough to pay attention to the child’s academics. It would especially difficult when your child struggles with decision-making, organization, impulsiveness. 

Do you let the child fail as a learning lesson, or step in?  I only intervened when my child believed that an injustice had occurred, or that the work was confusing, or on those rare times when the teacher was truly wrong.

Every child has to learn to walk independently, for the parent isn’t always going to be there. 

The best metaphor is potty training.  The child has to have accidents now and then in order to understand how unpleasant the results feel. The chaffing and burning teach the child to get to the commode in time. If the child never experiences discomfort, life lessons are not learned.

While I’ve been retired a number of years, I often wonder what things are like now. I’d like to believe that all parents maintain just enough involvement to ensure that their child does the best he/she can.

The Perils Confronting Classroom Teachers

            My first teaching position was in a preschool organized by the local recreation department. Students ranged in age from two to almost five. They had to be potty-trained, but they still peed on chairs, floors, carpet and outdoor equipment. They weren’t supposed to arrive sick, but they did. They wiped snot on everything in the room, from puzzles to paint brushes. They coughed on everyone and sneezed without thoughts of the safety of others.

            It wasn’t any better when I taught Kindergarten and Third grade. The older students still had accidents when urine pooled under their desks. One boy opened his desk and vomited inside where textbooks and materials were kept. Another threw up on my desk, covering attendance records, my grade book and lesson plans.

            My next full time position was as a Special Day Class teacher for fourth and five grade students. No longer did I have to deal with urine, but these kids, like the younger ones, loved to hold my hand. Considering where those hands had been, like digging deep inside nostrils, and taking care of bathroom needs, all most likely without using even a tiny bit of soap. It was no wonder that disease spread rapidly and constantly.

            Even when I moved to the high school I was not spared the contamination students brought into the room. They coughed and sneezed without protection. They came with pink eye and the flu. They distributed bronchitis and pneumonia germs with equanimity.

            Throughout all these years and changing circumstances, there was one constant: I fell ill. If I was lucky it was just a slight cold. If not, it was pneumonia. As an asthmatic, both were dangerous.

            Advance into the present. Parents want their kids in school and teachers love sharing the classroom with students, not teaching over the Internet. However, what has changed over the past thirty-plus years since I first took over a classroom? Nothing.

            Parents will still send sick kids to school. Kids will still wipe noses and cough all over everyone. Kids will pee and poop and vomit. Kids will want to sit on the teacher’s lap and hold the teacher’s hand. Kids will contaminate materials despite limited sanitation unless done by the teacher, who is then touching possibly contaminated objects.

            Imagine yourself in that classroom with little or no protection. Most classrooms lack AC and those that do have no windows to open to provide some circulation of air. Most classrooms have windows on one side of the room and only one door, on the same side. Some teachers installed ceiling fans in their rooms, at their own expense, but those fans do not provide sufficient circulation to keep people safe.

            Elementary classrooms generally have a sink, but not all do. Those with sinks often have empty soap dispensers. Unless the district provides sufficient sanitizer, the teacher has to buy it. There is limited cleaning done as maintenance are on a tight schedule.

            At my last position, the room was allotted three minutes of cleaning time. That meant a quick sweep of the floor and empting trash cans. Desks were cleaned by me or not at all. I only had time to clean them once or twice a week, at most. Think about the germs that developed in between?

            My students shared textbooks, crayons, markers, rulers and other materials. They were never cleaned. We had one set of dictionaries that were shared by two teachers. They were never cleaned. I shared an overhead projector with two other teachers. It was never cleaned.

            The entire time I taught, over a span of thirty-three years, we never had a pandemic such as the one the world faces today. The flu, yes. Pink eye, yes. But COVID-19? No.

            Considering that districts pack thirty-four students in most classrooms, squeezed together in poorly ventilated rooms, in-person teaching is a disaster peeking around the corner. With little kids the desks can be further apart, but not six feet. High school students have much bigger bodies and so desks are often inches apart.

            Elementary teachers are figuring out ways to use corrals to keep students’ emissions behind Plexiglas or cardboard. If it’s cardboard, how does the teacher make eye contact when the students’ eyes are hidden? You can’t put cardboard corrals around high school desks. Perhaps Plexiglas would work.

            Who’s paying for these dividers? Cash-strapped districts or the teacher? Are teachers expected to supply these devices just as they buy tissue, crayons and paper?

            While I am glad to be retired so that I am not worried about the germs floating around my classroom, I sympathize with teachers who do. If I was still working, I’d have to quit rather than risk my health.

            Parents want their kids in school. So do teachers. In order to make it work, responsibility has to be shared. Parents don’t send sick kids to school or kids who’ve been exposed to the virus. Teachers try to keep the classroom as safe as they can with the support of the district. Districts provide the PPE necessary to make the environment as safe as possible, even if it means buying industrial-size fans for every classroom.

            This is a huge dilemma for which there is no tidy answer. The virus is predicted to be with us for a while. What are the stakeholders doing to prepare?

            That’s the most important question to the most serious threat to public health that we’ve seen in modern history.